The Jews from Asia were not the believing
Jews in Jerusalem, but the Jews who had not believed in Christ, and they had
come from Asia, quite likely from the region around Ephesus where Paul had
ministered for a few years. It is quite likely they knew Trophimus from their
home region; from the text it seems that Trophimus was a Gentile. So they
either leaped to the conclusion, or used this as a false accusation for the
purpose of inciting a riot. Paul was physically assaulted, but before the
rioters could kill him, the Roman army intervened to quell the riot. The
Chiliarch (commander of 1,000) was unable to get any meaningful response from
the mob. It is not clear if he took Paul into protective custody, or simply
wanted to remove him from the mob as the focus of the unrest. The conversation
indicates that the Roman officer thought he was an Egyptian who led a revolt a
few years earlier in Jerusalem. Perhaps this was because of the size and
violence of the mob. These assassins were not the assassins we more typically
think of in history, the cult of assassins that was prominent in eleventh
through thirteenth centuries A.D., and were not located in Israel, but in
Western Iran, centered in Alamut. Furthermore, they were from the Ismaili sect
of Islam, not Jewish. The assassins referred to here were labeled with a Roman
term for a public bandit murderer, transliterated to Greek as sikarios.
Paul indicated that he was a Roman
citizen and asked permission to speak to the crowd. Being a Roman citizen was a
fairly significant card that Paul only played sparingly, but here he put it to
good use, to get an opportunity to present the gospel in Jerusalem.
No comments:
Post a Comment