Luke 22:21-23 Jesus fingers
Judas. Parallel passages Matt 26:24-26,
Mark 14:18-21, John 13:21-30. Jesus and Judas both knew what was going on, but
the other disciples were puzzled. Some of them perhaps thought their own lack
of faith might lead them to betray Christ. And most of them would flee when He
was arrested. But that was not the betrayal Jesus was talking about. Peter
later was restored after he denied Christ. But Judas' betrayal was born of
treachery. We cannot understand his motives because we do not have a lot of
information. We know that Judas would pilfer money from the common fund that
was collected from donations to support Jesus. (John 12:6) We do not have the
whole story of his downward spiral from small sins to the ultimate betrayal of
the Son of God. But as mentioned relative to Luke 22:3, by the time of the Last
Supper, Judas had sold out to Satan.
Luke 22:24-38 Jesus tries to give the
disciples perspective on His kingdom and what was about to happen. First He addresses greatness in God's kingdom
(22:24-30). Then He talks about Simon's impending denial (22:31-34). Finally He
attempts to steel them against the facts of His upcoming sufferings that their
faith will not fail. (22:35-38).
There
are many places where it is clear that the disciples did not understand about
what greatness in God's kingdom was all about. (Matt 18:1, Mark 9:34, Luke 9:46)
They asked who was greatest. In Matt 20:20-21, James and John put their mother
up to asking for their preferment. Here, in Luke 22:25-30, Jesus patiently
explains that values in God's kingdom are inverted from those of the world. Or
rather, it is the value system of the world that is topsy-turvy. In God's kingdom, the greatest is the one who
serves, not the one who is served. He is about to serve all mankind by dying
for their sins. His disciples will have the opportunity to share in this
service - the kingdom He grants them is that of suffering for His names' sake.
They may not immediately share in His throne by dying on crosses next to Him,
but ultimately, history records, they would share that aspect of His greatness
(not dying for others' sins, but dying in service to God's kingdom). And the
history records they did not die in battle as solders such as the Roman army
might have them fight and die, but dying as soldiers in God's army in which
they voluntarily laid down their lives to carry the gospel to the world and
show God's love for all of humankind. And thus they would sit at His table in
His kingdom.
Jesus
prophetically tells Peter of his immediate future. (Matt 26:31-35, Mark
14:27-31, John 13:37-38) Perhaps this was part of His response to their quest
for greatness in His kingdom. Whether this was based on His understanding of
Peter's character, or a revelation of the Holy Spirit, we know that He
precisely knew what Peter would do. And that Satan also had a role in this.
Although Judas had completely sold out to Satan and thus would betray Jesus,
Peter would be sifted by Satan, who wanted to separate Peter from Jesus through
Peter's weakness. And he almost succeeded. We see this in Peter's dejected
behavior after the resurrection. Even though Jesus had risen from the dead,
Peter did not think he could ever be restored to Jesus' trust. (John 21:3 &
15-17). But Jesus' restoration of Peter demonstrates the overpowering nature of
God's love and grace. He cannot overcome the deliberate choice to betray Him,
as was the case with Judas, and therefore could only use the actions of Judas
to further His own glory involuntarily. But with Peter, He was able to fully
restore him to faith and fellowship, so that unlike Judas, who killed himself,
Peter became the rock of faith, the founding pastor of the church in Jerusalem.
Certainly the sermon he gave on Pentecost, recorded in Acts 2, indicates that
he had overcome or transcended his cowardice.
Verses
35-38 are enigmatic, at least to me. Why did Jesus tell His disciples to sell
their robes to buy swords, and then say it was enough when they showed Him two?
He knew what was going to happen, evidenced by His quote of Isaiah 53:12 in
Luke 22:37. Certainly He knew that it was futile to fight the Roman army or
even the Temple guard. He knew that His kingdom would not be built with
military conquests. Perhaps this was so that they would have at least one sword
so that He could make the point in the garden of Gethsemane about the futility
of fighting with swords. (22:49-51 below). No obvious explanation emerges.
No comments:
Post a Comment