Acts 11:1-18 Peter recounts the
events recorded in Acts 10 to the church in Jerusalem. It would be perfectly
appropriate for the church leadership to look into reports of questionable
activities. Given the then-current cultural captivity of the early church to
their Jewish tradition, the questions that are asked of Peter are natural and
scarcely unexpected. In fact, The Lord was able to use this to begin the
process of showing the church leadership that He intended His church to be
all-inclusive. Peter's story, ending with the question, "... who was I
that I could stand in God’s way?”
shows that what was accomplished through these events was able to convince
people, even though they may not have understood God's ways.
There
are often events that happen in the context of church life that merit close
examination. These could revolve around the actions of church members, or
rumors about people (what they used to call tale-bearing or gossip), or
disagreements about doctrine. Usually, big church fights are not handled well.
If people with strong personalities and opinions come into conflict, the work
of the Holy Spirit is drowned out in the personalities. We have in this
passage, and a subsequent section on the same general topic (the church council
that decided the issue of Gentiles keeping the Jewish law, recorded in Acts
15), an example in which those on all sides were willing to listen to the Holy
Spirit and be led of God to a resolution. The personalities were no less strong
then. Perhaps it was the temporal proximity of the earthly presence of Jesus
that kept them in check, a profound humility on the part of the apostles that
for all their great gifts, they were still men who had made and still could
make mistakes, and needed to hear from God. Self-righteousness is a trait that
dies hard in each of us. The early church spread like wildfire because it was
the work of the Holy Spirit and the church knew it. Contemporary churches, of
whatever ilk, seem imbued through and through with the self-assuredness born of
doctrinal purity. And most likely this accounts to a large extent for the
church's lack of power in the modern world. Not the power of politics or money,
but the demonstrated power of the Holy Spirit.
And
so the ironic irony is that modern Christians who pursue doctrinal purity and
personal holiness, based on logic (in the case of theology) and rules (in the
case of holiness) never really achieve either, and also emasculate the very
work that God has put us here to do.
Because it is the presence of God that makes these things possible; that
is, the presence of God enables us to keep our doctrine straight, to live in a
way that honors God and His standards, and that even enables us to know and
walk with Him.
No comments:
Post a Comment